Australia's Housing Affordability Crisis: Is There Really a Solution?
Pina Brandi • October 23, 2024

The Australian dream of owning a home is growing more elusive as property prices skyrocket, leaving many first-home buyers wondering if affordable housing is attainable. This crisis has sparked a national debate among politicians, media, and Australians alike. But what would it truly take to make housing more affordable, and why is this issue so complex?


Understanding the Challenge


To address housing affordability, we must first understand the underlying factors that shape the market. While it may seem like a straightforward task—either reduce prices or increase purchasing power—the reality involves a balancing act with economic and social factors.


  1. Rising Property Values
    Australia's property market, valued at around $10.7 trillion, has seen homes transform into valuable assets. Nearly 70% of these properties are owned by average Australians, creating a strong incentive to keep prices steady or rising. This complex dynamic means most homeowners, including investors, have little interest in seeing property values fall. For any significant drop to happen, external pressures like a severe recession, extreme mortgage defaults, or strict legislative changes would be required—none of which appear likely in the near term.
  2. Who Really Wants Prices to Drop?
    While first-home buyers and some investors may wish for prices to dip, it’s typically a short-term sentiment. Once they enter the market, their priorities often shift to maintaining or increasing the value of their investments. This means sustained price drops may not be a solution everyone agrees on, even among prospective buyers.


The Two-Way Fix: Temporary Relief vs. Systemic Change


When discussing solutions, there are two main approaches:

  • Increase Buying Power
    By offering grants, subsidies, or tax incentives, the government can temporarily boost the purchasing power of specific groups. However, with increased buying power comes increased competition, which may actually inflate prices, leaving future buyers facing the same or worse affordability issues.
  • Decrease Property Values
    For meaningful long-term affordability, a significant price drop would be necessary. However, the unintended consequences would likely affect both homeowners’ wealth and broader economic stability.


Key Considerations: The Limits of New Housing Supply

A common proposal to solve housing affordability is simply building more homes. While increasing supply is essential, it’s not a one-size-fits-all solution. Several factors limit its effectiveness:

  • Location Preferences
    Building homes in low-demand areas won’t solve the problem if people prefer to live near cities, job hubs, or family. Property demand remains strong in metropolitan areas, where lifestyle amenities and employment are concentrated.
  • Infrastructure and Amenities
    Even if new homes are built in popular locations, insufficient infrastructure—schools, hospitals, and public transport—can limit their appeal and sustainability. Many Australians seek not just a home but a thriving community and adequate services to support their lifestyle.
  • Zoning Restrictions
    Zoning laws and local council regulations complicate development in high-demand areas. While efforts to relax these rules are emerging, the process can be lengthy and complex.



Housing affordability in Australia isn’t a simple problem with a single solution. Addressing it will require a multi-faceted approach that considers social, economic, and infrastructural realities. Next week, we'll explore other factors driving the affordability crisis, including economic trends, investor activity, and political influences.

share to

By Pina Brandi December 10, 2025
Around 2017–2018, growth stalls and dips modestly after APRA’s investor growth cap (2014) and interest‑only cap (2017), which is the effect you’re asking about.
By Pina Brandi December 1, 2025
Melrose Park’s transformation from an industrial precinct into a residential and mixed-use community has been a strategically significant shift for Sydney’s urban future. Historically, the area was home to pharmaceutical and light-industrial operations, but over time these industries declined, consolidated elsewhere, or simply outgrew the outdated warehouses and fragmented road layout. Keeping the land zoned industrial would have meant under-utilising a large, strategically located pocket of Sydney at a time when housing demand is at critical levels. Redeveloping Melrose Park allows Sydney to introduce thousands of new homes in an inner-suburban area without pushing growth further to the city’s outskirts. With capacity for around 10,000–11,000 dwellings, plus retail, open space, a new high school and community facilities, the precinct is envisioned as a self-contained, modern neighbourhood with liveability at its core. Instead of being an isolated residential pocket, Melrose Park is being planned as a walkable, amenity-rich town centre where green spaces, urban parks, and mixed-use buildings form a cohesive and sustainable environment. Its location is one of its strongest advantages. Positioned on the Parramatta River, the suburb sits almost exactly halfway between Sydney CBD and Parramatta CBD, making it highly attractive for commuters who want balance, convenience and lifestyle. It is minutes from major employment hubs, established transport corridors like Victoria Road, and future connections that will further integrate the precinct into Sydney’s broader network. The land parcel is also unusually large and contiguous for an inner-suburban area, enabling a full masterplan rather than piecemeal development.  Overall, the shift from industrial to residential in Melrose Park wasn’t just a rezoning exercise; it was a strategic realignment of land use to meet Sydney’s changing economic, demographic, and lifestyle needs. Its prime location ensures the precinct will continue to attract demand, support growth, and deliver long-term value for residents and investors alike.
By Pina Brandi November 29, 2025
APRA has been explicit that the DTI cap is a financial‑stability tool, but it is deliberately designed not to choke off finance for new housing supply
Show More